Failing is the best way to transform your body? Yes, it is!

Exercising can sometimes seem a little confusing. There are so many options, so many philosophies, and so many contradictions out there that it can sometimes lead to to not want to exercise at all, for fear of doing it wrong. The one thing that always seems straight forward when you're doing an exercise program, and typically the first thing people think about when their trainer tells them to do a certain movement, is how many reps are you supposed to do.

Typically, you'll look at a program designed to transform your body, and you'll see something like 4 sets, for 8 repetitions. Or, it might say 4 sets for 16 repetitions. Most people will feel like they at least understand that fundamental part of the exercise programming. Unfortunately, this is untrue. If your goal is to transform your body in some way, whether your goal is fat loss, putting on lean muscle, or bulking, your objective is to force your muscles to endure a new stimulus, or a novel stimulus. That happens by pushing your muscle to the limits of its current capabilities, so that it grows and adjusts to the new demands that you're placing on it.

With that premise in mind, aiming to complete 4 sets for 8 repetitions is not actually the goal. You want to FAIL while striving to achieve 8 repetitions. This can easily be the most difficult part of body transformation and resistance training to understand. There is no benefit in lifting a weight that you can comfortably lift for 8 repetitions, and then putting the weight down. If your programming is for 8 repetitions, you must select a weight that makes you FAIL at or near 8 repetitions. You should be on the 6th repetition, and your muscles should say "we don't have 2 more reps!" But, more often than not, when people see their rep ranges and goals, they grab a dumbbell or a weight that they know they can comfortably lift, and then lift it. Your workout program is not an achievement checklist-- look at it as a failure checklist. You gain significantly more muscle and reach your goals sooner by failing at or near that 8th rep. There are no gold stars for finishing 8 reps when your muscles could have done significantly more work!

If this were a race, imagine yourself nearing full exhaustion as the finish line is within sight. Achievement would look like you running through that finish line tape, chest high, still going at your race pace. That is not what we want when we're transforming your body through resistance training. Rather, you want to see that finish line in sight, and then stumble just 4 steps shy of the finish line! You catch your breath, gather yourself, stand up and grit yourself through those final four steps as you cross the finish line in last place. THAT is what you're looking for as you complete a set.

Are you familiar with that metaphor for life, the one stating that we learn more from our failures than from our successes? That is exactly what your muscles do, and building that lean muscle is will accelerates your metabolism and allows you to burn more fat, helping you achieve your body composition goals! You are far more "successful" from a body transformation standpoint if you only get 9 out of those 12 reps on the first attempt, and then catch your breath for 10 seconds to get those final 3 reps. If you see yourself approaching that programmed final rep and know that you're about to cross the finish line with your chest nice and high, be sure to select a heavier weight for your next set. What that tells us is that you're stronger than you thought!

Reach your body composition goals-- fail consistently! Once you learn how to fail, you will consistently succeed.

The Debate: Is Being Fat a Choice?

This debate started popping up in my social media and news feeds a few months ago, and it surprised me: Is being overweight a choice? There were at least five longform videos and a handful of articles floating around about this topic, and I consumed each one. The common threads among them were that there was very little science, but the opinions of a mixed panel of fitness professionals and enthusiasts alongside body positivity advocates and individuals who struggled with obesity.

Overwhelmingly, the majority of the individuals on these panels felt that being overweight was a deliberate choice. The fitness-minded individuals tended to focus on the axiom of "calories in, calories out" as their irrefutable evidence (in their minds), while some of the body positivity advocates similarly shared anecdotes about times when they did manage to lose weight, and cited those short-term successes as evidence that their obesity must be entirely their choice. This does tend to match my own experiences when I hear people talk about their struggles with weight gain. They tend to cite poor willpower and personal failure when we talk about this topic.

Well, the science does not match up to any of these opinions. Multiple studies show us that the single greatest factor that determines whether someone will be obese is their genetics. The next largest factor was the body composition of the person's parents AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION. What that means that if an individual was conceived by obese parents, they were significantly more likely to be overweight as a child, all the way into adulthood. Finally, multiple studies over the past 30 years have disproven the adages of willpower being the determining factor for weight loss, and that if you're failing it's because you must lack willpower. Previous and current environment, metabolism, gut microbiome, and the cognitive processing of things like hunger cues are all much greater factors for why our bodies look the way that they do, despite our diet and exercise attempts.

In a lot of ways, part of your destiny was determined by your parents. They aren't the villains of your story by any means; they did their best, and usually repeated what they were exposed to or what was socially acceptable when they raised you. Unless they force-fed you like human foie gras, we cannot blame them for having any sort of malicious intent for how we turned out. The education and information simply was not there! Compare it to parents with kids in school today. Those kids are learning "common core" mathematics principles that their parents never learned. How is the parent expected to automatically reinforce those common core principles if they weren't taught those principles in the first place? The same thing applies to food science and exercise science for wellness and fitness. I can distinctly remember a time in the late 90s, watching the evening news, when a news anchor said that eggs were bad for us one night, and then said eggs were good for us the following night! Several foods were demonized one week and exalted the next week, depending on who was paying for the "research".

That being said, our circumstances are one thing. Our deliberate decisions are another thing. While we aren't always fully responsible for our current circumstances, to include how we were raised and how prepared we were for life when we left home, we can choose to take control of our future. We can educate ourselves on the most effective ways to reach our goals. We can seek expert assistance and guidance, helping us to stay accountable to ourselves. Most of all, we can engage with one another from a place of empathy and not judge someone for their circumstances. You never know their whole story!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

1. Piernas C, Aveyard P, Jebb SA. Recent trends in weight loss attempts: repeated cross-sectional analyses from the health survey for England. Int J Obes. 2016;40(11):1754–1759. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.141. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Piernas C, Harmer G, Jebb SA. Removing seasonal confectionery from prominent store locations and purchasing behaviour within a major UK supermarket: evaluation of a nonrandomised controlled intervention study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(3):e1003951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003951. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Halford JCG, Gillespie J, Brown V, Pontin EE, Dovey TM. Effect of television advertisements for foods on food consumption in children. Appetite. 2004;42(2):221–225. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.11.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Boyland EJ, Harrold JA, Dovey TM, Allison M, Dobson S, Jacobs M-C, Halford JCG. Food choice and overconsumption: effect of a premium sports celebrity endorser. J Pediatr. 2013;163(2):339–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.059. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, McPherson K, Thomas S, Mardell J, et al. Tackling obesities: future choices. Project report. London: Government Office for Science; 2007.

6. Bandy LK, Scarborough P, Harrington RA, Rayner M, Jebb SA. Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1477-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Pell D, Mytton O, Penney TL, Briggs A, Cummins S, Penn-Jones C, Rayner M, Rutter H, Scarborough P, Sharp SJ, et al. Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2021;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] Retracted

8. Eisend M. The third-person effect in advertising: a meta-analysis. J Advert. 2017;46(3):377–394. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2017.1292481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Morphett K, Partridge B, Gartner C, Carter A, Hall W. Why don’t smokers want help to quit? A qualitative study of smokers' attitudes towards assisted vs. unassisted quitting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6591–6607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Marteau TM, White M, Rutter H, Petticrew M, Mytton OT, McGowan JG, Aldridge RW. Increasing healthy life expectancy equitably in England by 5 years by 2035: could it be achieved? Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2571–2573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31510-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

So, I gave Ozempic a shot.

You read that right. Let me be more specific: I gave Ozempic a shot at being transparent about how they achieve weight loss for the patients who use their product. I gave them a shot, whether in their commercials or their press releases, to be more open about how much of that weight loss is fat, and how much of that weight loss was precious muscle. I gave them a shot to be open about the fact that Ozempic, or semaglutide, was essentially training your body to become anorexic. As you can imagine, I'm still waiting for the transparency and probably should stop holding my breath!

The bottom line is that yes, semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist used to treat type-2 diabetes, can be effective in weight loss. It does this by altering an individual's appetite regulation and altering how an individual absorbs nutrients from their food. The massive downside is that the lost weight is typically upwards of 40% muscle mass, not fat. Muscle becomes more precious the older we get, and taking something that causes you to lose large amounts of lean muscle mass is not a winning formula for long-term success. Muscle mass is critical for a healthy metabolism, strength, and your ability to ward off diseases and illnesses. Dehydration and excessive diarrhea can also occur, which disrupts balances in electrolytes -- elements that are critical for total body health and functionality. Some patients have also suffered from acute kidney injury. Typically, those individuals were already at-risk for poor kidney function, but the outcome is still worth noting. I judge no one for trying Ozempic/semaglutide, but be sure to be on a balanced diet before you begin, and engage in regular, consistent resistance training or weight training to build muscle! Your overall health DEPENDS on it.

John,

the Everyday J.O.E.